I prefer the RA core because of the snappier UI (saving and loading states is faster it allows you to map quick save/quick load to buttons too) and added graphical options. They seem identical performance and compatibility-wise. Also, the standalone emulator seems to handle resolutions better and detects game region automatically. Last time I tried the RA core, it took way longer time to load Sega CD games compared to the standalone emulator. Master System/Genesis/Game Gear/Sega CD: Genesis Plus GX. TurboGrafx-16/TurboGrafx-CD: Mednafen PCE Fast RA. It supports light gun games, has seemingly less input lag than Nestopia/FCEUMM RA (seems easier to time jumps and control Mario midair in SMB) and also better compatibility than those RA cores (Nestopia struggles with rom hacks, FCEUMM struggles with 3D Worldrunner). ![]() Haven't tried alternatives, but I haven't had any problems with this emulator. Here are my two cents based on what I use:Ītari 2600: Stella RA.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |